Astromania 70 mm Compacte Deluxe Finder & Guidescope Kit met 1,25 'Dubbele Spiraalvormige Focuser - Geleidend met de Mini-Guide Scope: Dus astrofotografie is gemakkelijker en minder apparatuur

Edited review.....after some time witht his scope I decided to add some more info....see the additions at the bottom.First....the reviews here are for a combination of all models....50mm, 60mm, 70mm. Mine is the 70mm. I already have a 50mm home made autoguide scope that works fantastic...but needed a longer focal length scope to maintain the right ratio for one of my longer focal length scopes.The most important thing for an autoguide scope is it must have absolutely 0 slop....if it has even the slightest amount of slop it will never give good results. I was pleased that they addressed this issue and have a rock solid setup. While it has a long coarse draw tube, that would be problematic if it couldn't be locked down....there are three screws to lock it in. place...one thumb screw and two set screws. I never liked using Allen screw wrenches in the dark so replaced those two set screws with thumb screws. The double heclical focuser has no slop and works smoothly. Once focuse it has a thumb screw brake to keep the focuser from moving. Finally 1 1/4" focuser has a brass compression ring but goes one extra step by including two thumb screws to really lock the camera down. The scope rings have nice larger thumb screws for adjustment and have plastic tip inserts so you won't scratch the scope barrel. In the picture at Amazon it looked like the lens was very close to the front of the scope and I was concered I might have to make s dew shield. Turns out it has a decent dew shield that slides out to about 1 1/2" from the lens. That is just OK....my future project it to make a much longer one to cut down the chance of dewing. I have much longer dew shields on my main 6" APO refractor and also my old 50mm guider scope and surprisingly have NEVER had to deal with dew with either scope. But if necessary I do have dew heaters.Overall the scope looks very solid and is well engineered and at a good price.The only possible CON is that it is a much larger/heavier scope than the 50mm and 60mm versions. If you have a mount that is at its limit weight wise this may be the thing that puts it over the top and you may not get good results with your overtaxed mount. I have a Astro Physics 1100 so no problem.The old maxim that a guide scope should be around 1/3 of the focal length of the main scope is based on visual guideing. With todays guiding cameras the recommendation is to keep the ratio to a max of about 1/6th of the main scope focal length to as much as 1/10th of the ratio depending on the pixel size of your guide camera. The 70mm scope has a 400mm focal length so that should easily guide up to a 2400mm focal length with an average camera and as much as 4000 mm with a small pixel sized camera....but that would be pushing it. Todays software and cameras are so good that once setup you should have no problem getting rock solid guiding as long as you have a good mount. For short focal length refractors though this 70mm - 400mm focal length scope may be overkill....one of the cheaper, lighter guide scopes (50 or 60mm) will work just fine as they have around 165mm to 240mm focal length.================================Additional input from my original review.....I continue to be very impressed with this scope as a a guiding scope....so much so I bought the 60mm version for use with my travel scope and mount which is a ZWO AM5 mount with 80mm APO refractor. The 70mm worked fine with that setup but i was overkill....the guide scope was narely as lartge a the main scope ;-) Since Ilready had a 50mm home made guide scope I decided to go with the 60mm that has ad 240mm focal length. I definitely like the new scope as much as the 70mm and construction is idential on both. I used the larger 7omm version with my AP 1100 mount supporting either a 6" APO refractor or a 11" Celestron SCT HD. Guiding using Maxim DL was flawless and I never had any problem finding stars to guide on anywhere I aimed my telescope. I also removed the two hex screws that the stock setup had and replaced them with thumb screws identical to the one already existing holding the sliding rough focus barrel in place. That is probably the only con on both scopes. It would have been nice if they had thumb screws on all three of those positions....I HATE the idea of using allen wrenches in the dark and chancing droping them.I also read through some of the other reviews....there were a couple of bits of misinformation. This is an air spaced Achromat NOT a cheap cemented lens. For that reason this is a better optic. You can tell it is air spaced as you can see the three rectangula spacers around the lens.....this is NOT a defect but a good and normal design that most high end refractors use and do not show up in photos. Both of my scopes give nice stars although one person said they had weird stars and another mentioned their lens was placed backwards. In that case they were able to easiy reverse the optics and it works fine. Of course that should not have happened and signals a QC issue....but in my case the two scopes were well assembled and no glitches in the optics and the stars were nice and round. It is not an APO scope of course and not expected or needed at this price or as a guide scopeThe newer 60mm version has already seen use and like its 70mm brother works great....in fact unless you have a very long focal lengh scope it may be the better choice as long as you have a guide scope with pixels on the smaller side. But with my longer focal length scopes I like that precision. I use both with either a ASI 290 MINI or a much older SBIG STL 237 gjide camera that is slaved from my full frame SBIG camera. No issues with either camera/guide scope combination. In both cases i did fabricate longer dew shields as I refer that to having to use dew heaters. So my review is still very positive and I highly recommend the 60 or 70mm versions. Not having the 50mm version I can't comment on that one but have no reason to believe it wouldn't also be fine. In any case it is so much better than the cheaper toy-like guide scopes that are being pushed today.

Tight tolerances , feels solid and a good tool. Glass is fine, for any amateur. With a budget. Picture was taken with the guide scope and a ZWO Asi 662 camera. I'll keep it.

I have the 70mm version and found this to be good quality optical instrument and a great guide scope - for folks who have a long FL main scope. There are other (and cheaper) FLs available. I bought a 0.5 FL reducer just in case – but haven’t used it, yet. Good dew shield, great worm focuser, well-built at 2.5 lbs and only about $160.To my surprise, for beginners who don’t want to spend too much money before they know they truly love Astrophotography and can master and afford it, it also makes for a decent primary scope (which is why I bought it – replace “beginner” with not-so-sure “returner”). Before you stop me and ask: “What about chromatic aberration? What about distortions around the edge of the field-of-view?” Well, the answer is: surprisingly, there isn’t all that much of that. This is actually a great beginner’s main scope if attached to a good (perhaps used, low $$ automated mound), a steady tripod, and a decent camera.Below, I will discuss three images I have recently taken. All are on the ZWO TC40 tripod with the ZWO AM5 automated mount using the ASIAIR PLUS mini-computer interface, and with a ZWO ASI 585MC camera. Note of caution: in that configuration, make sure the scope sits high up on the mount and does not easily run into the tripod. I am using a triple Vixen extender of which I have sawed off one offending member – but even then in that configuration the scope needs to be high on the Vixen receptacle to not run into the tripod. I live in the SF Bay area, so there is a lot of light pollution. Often I cannot even see Polaris with my bare eyes (and yes, I know it's a variable star :).All images were taken at a gain of 301; 200 images taken total, processed with DeepSkyStacker, Graxpert, and GIMP. All without a guide scope (through which I obviously took these images). Inexpensive SvBONY IR and UV cut-off filter to reduce dispersion.M53:Here I was mainly testing this guide scope’s optics. And since w/o guide scope, I used only 3s exposures to avoid star trails due to wind and mount tracking errors.DeepSkyStacker does not like short exposures, especially if there is a bright object in the frame (here: the core of the cluster). I needed to reduce the percentage of max light that is used for detecting stars for stacking: 10% is normal (about 3-4 stars, here; 5% not enough (about 5 stars, here); and 2% gives 7-10 stars, with only about 50% of 200 stacked images acceptable – which I picked; with drizzle set to zero for crisp dim stars.I think you will agree the image is great for this type and price of telescope.Leo Triplet:90% of 200 exposure at 20s (no guiding, of course). Looks good to me, given the 70 mm aperture and the limited exposure time.M101:148 of the 200 exposures where deemed good enough. Here you can see the problem when not taking “darks” at high contrast settings in GIMP: hot pixels and striations – but I did not care, for the purpose at hand.Edit: M101, another version:Same as before but now with a Celestron X-Cel LX 3x Barlow (!), and a ZWO ASI533MC Pro USB 3.0 Color camera. Using the 26 "best" out of 70 3m (180s) light exposures, gain 101, T = 0°C,20 3m (180s) dark exposures, gain 101, T = 0C = 1h . FL should be 3x400 = 1,200mm but ASIAIR says it's 1,370mm. That happens with Barlows and varying back focus... and it is a problem: it means the effective magnification is not 3x, but 1370/400 = 3.425; or a relative light loss of 3.42^2 -- almost 12 instead of the nine I expected. So, bear that in mind - there wasn't enough light to use DSS to stack, but ASTAP worked fine.

The Tube length is so exact it allows no room to add an angled 45 or 90 sight angle. and the picture is upside down you cannot put a corrector on because the front glass in not adjustable

Good packing and telescope arrived on time. Needed 400mm guide scope for a 2719mm Celestron C14 with 0.7xreducer. I have not had a chance to compare the guiding with the 400mm vs the 240mm I had previously. The longer FL guider is recommded for main scopes over 1200mmm or so. I would like to do 6 to 10 minutes exposures for narrow band imaging and I usually got a smeared image at over 3 minutes with the 240mm guide scope. Paramount MEII mount.One caveat is that for some reason my system software (NINA) reattached to the guide camera with the 400mm guider as an 8 bit device rather than a 16 bit device. So I spent 3+ days trying to track down why the image was just noise. Once I had that figured out, the focus position was almost identical to the 240mm.My guiding is usually 0.25" RMS but there appear to be occasional larger deviations that smear the image with my 240mm guide scope.