KCR Smart TV, 43,2 cm (17 inch) LED digitale DVB-T2, draagbare tv-Freeview, WLAN-ondersteuning RJ45, USB-aansluiting, hoofdtelefoonuitgang, coaxiale afstandsbediening, AV-ingang, HDMI in, zwart

Geweldig !!!

De kijkhoek van dit scherm is niet groot. Je moet er goed voor zitten m het beeld goed te kunnen zien. Indien montage op hoogte, dan valt het beeld erg tegen. Dvb-t2 ontvangst is goed. Geluid ook. Toestel is verder traag met opstarten, traag met reactie op afstandsbediening, en appartementen zijn ook traag. Tja, het ding kost ook maar net iets meer als 100 euro...

Lo único que no tiene en el mando un botón para programas favoritos hay que entrar el la programación de la televiin para buscarlo y tampoco puedes meter favoritos dentro de la programación

I have to be sat down in the kitchen when working now as I need a lot of resting between preparing any meal, this littleTV is a sanity saver for me, a nice small screen set up with a little DVD player and I can relax completely and watch something that makes me happy while working and relaxing, the picture is quite small but I'm really not very far away from it so that is not a bother to me, the picture quality is very nice and the sound quality is completely acceptable to me.Being honest the smart TV features mean nothing to me as I don't watch TV but I'm sure for those that do its a nice extra feature but not a consideration for me in my viewing habits.Perfectly good little TV and I'm happy to recommend him on to others who need a nice little TV for a small corner somewhere.

De media kon niet worden geladen.

Ordered via vine.This Android TV is like a hybrid of a PC Monitor, yet it has Smart/WIFI TV features so when this came up, my Mini-PC supports 4x 4K Monitors via HDMI, DisplayPort and Type-C, there were several things I could do with this. But it's challenging to review as besides a 1080P 10" Mini monitor I had in my van years ago, it's difficult to compare this to anything but the very small yet full Smart TV and connectivity market or sector, which is not the same as general TVs or PC Monitors.The primary drawback for me is that is 720P resolution, so I did not have to pay for this. And tbh as somebody who is on the computer ally day, working with technology. If I were shopping for a monitor or TV, the minimum I would expect even at this price is 1080P.So this is a TV with Smart features, one could very easily use it as a Monitor since it supports HDMI and WIFI, and if this had been the standard most common 1080P resolution then it would have been even more appealing and versatile, as I bought a Dell Monitor at Christmas, and depending on the size you can get 22" Monitors for under £90, so it's unusual that KCR did not make this 1080P, then it would have truly been a very versatile Smart TV/Monitor hybrid as most PC users would expect 1080P as a minimum, so that affects what this Smart TV is most suited for.Nonetheless, even as a 720P it's android TV OS, Freeview and Chromecast support means it can be used as a Television, however at 17" this is a Mini-TV and literally the smallest TV size you can really get, even some Laptops are 17" so it's a bit unusual in that sense.Also it has VESA bracket support I believe though I've not got a bracket to test it, it seems to support VESA so this is well suited for a kids/teenagers bedroom, as more of a casual TV but its 17" size means that if put on the wall it needs to be positioned very close to be watchable, in many bedrooms this isn't going to be possible or feasible certainly not as a primary TV opposite your bed, the 17" is too small for that. But it could be used in any room, or a kitchen providing you do not have any issues with cabling. As if you want to use this connected to antenna via its coaxial, it's unlikely you'd want multiple long cables everywhere.So I think this is probably best as a desktop Mini TV/Monitor, however you wish to use it. For a Monitor it would again maybe be acceptable for children, with its YouTube and other apps you can download to view content.It's the Smart and Android Apps that make this somewhat appealing, you can even put it in a vehicle as it comes with an AC and a 12V adapter. Although this would be too large to go in the front cabin of any car, I used to have a 10" mini Monitor in my work van and that was about the largest I could get away with.But in other vehicles, camper vans or any vehicle large enough with either VESA bracket or a desktop for it's stand, as pictured. Otherwise you could use the Monitor on it's own with or without the stand with a bit of DIY.It comes with a remote which in addition to the physical buttons on the monitor itself, well it offers full control and functionality so it has to be quite large, and the buttons are large and easy to use. It's not terrible in quality, but nor is it premium or with any styling so quite basic but for a 17" TV yes they could have made it look better, just by making it a different shape other than a rectangle with right angles. Even for a TV at this price, I have bought much cheaper products that at least have some slight ergonomic shape and make the remote look nice and easier to handle.But they have covered everything, nothing is missing on the remote and it's easy to operate large buttons are good for entering in WIFI passwords and general navigation.As for the WIFI it is 2.4Ghz not dual-band or 5Ghz, this isn't a big deal for the average provider supplied router that is broadcasting both 2.4Ghz and 5Ghz by default, providing one has strong WIFI coverage in the TV's location, 2.4Ghz can provide fast enough speed for 720P streaming. Technically 2.4Ghz is better at long range and through walls but slower. Depending on the location on the TV, unless you have very slow or poor coverage it isn't a problem.If this is used not indoors then you would already have an internet source, or you could even tether to your mobile.As for the style and appearance, it's not a slim bezel or premium looking but it's ok for a 720P display, and the performance image quality is as good as i'd expect. It looks fine when running i've only tested YouTube, it's not laggy as such but it's not super fast or responsive either, although I didn't check for updates.Obviously this TV is not suitable for any proper gaming, unless it's very light kids, teenager games if used as a Monitor - Again 1080P would have made it more appealing for gamers, but to be fair its a Smart TV and very far away from even some decent larger 22"+ Gaming Monitors that you could buy for the same price.The connectivity on this is pretty good, the integrated speakers don't sound amazing but good enough for it's size. And it does have a digital optical SPDIF if you wanted to connect this to any mini soundbar or some cheap active speakers if you wanted, but for a 17" TV I think anyone looking for a TV this size will be relying on it's integrated speakers which are ok, probably 2x 5W or something but it also has a 3.5mm which can also connect to any external sound systems or headphones more likely. So if I were installing this in a camper van, besides the 720P its perfect for that. The Mini Smart TV Market is one that I haven't specifically shopped for so I can't say I know exactly how much a 720P 17" version costs or similar sizes, it's unusual to find all these features in a 17" TV but I think that is by design.So comparing this to regular TVs or Monitors is not helpful or really a fair comparison.The rest of the connectivity is what i'd expect in any SMART TV, two HDMIs and AV and 2 USB's and even an Ethernet connection and 2x USB for Firesticks etc or USB dongles.In fact it has a lot of connectivity for its size, considering a 17" very small Smart TV is not going to be a primary living room TV it's quite likely this will be watched by 1 person, maybe two for obvious reasons.It has more connectivity than I think people will even need, like 2x HDMI's and 2x USB for a TV this size I don't imagine people needing more than one HDMI source and/or 1 USB firestick but I can't complain, it has all the connectivity covered even if I wouldn't use all of it but for connectivity I can't fault it really.So in conclusion, of course the main thing which I think really at this price should be expected is 1080P, this wouldn't have significantly increased manufacturing costs by too much - But 1080P is almost the standard definition people expect for Smart TVs or Monitor of any Size.Years ago I had a 10" 1080P mini Monitor with HDMI input in my work van connected to a DVR and rear camera on my TSCO Traffic Van, and I think this Smart TV is designed for similar atypical applications.Still in 2025 I would expect 1080P, even my 7 year old 15.6" standard size laptop was 1080P and all Laptops are a minimum of 1080P so whilst it's less important on a 17", I have purchased and installed/replaced 15.6 inch 1080P laptop screens, so the difference between 720P and 1080P in 2025 is not expensive compared to FHD vs UHD.So if this was 1080P it would have made this both more appealing and more versatile for numerous applications, scenarios, whether you want to use this as a Smart TV and/or a computer or Monitor display at the same time, for general computer user not high-end gaming. But either indoors or in vehicles, motorhomes anywhere not not in a household.And then it's size, I understand there is a market for 17" Smart TVs such as this and I plan to use it when I upgrade my fathers laptop to a Mini-PC so he can have dual monitors, 720P would be absolutely fine for him.And for it's current £113 you can definitely get superior and larger dedicated monitors so I'm not going to compare it to those as they are entirely different products despite the similarities in its capability and appearance.I spent all of Xmas shopping for a 65" TV which I bought, but I haven't shopped or compared for this category of mini-TVs at 17" this is a Mini-Smart TV so I am not quite sure if this is good value for money or not without looking for comparisons. But I don't think this is a bargain or the best 17" Mini Smart TV you could get for this price either, I think you could get a 1080P version, or even a larger one with a budget of £114 so I personally don't think I'd buy this if there are many 1080Ps available.However if you are shopping for a 17" Smart TV like this, it's not short of features and connectivity, I think this would be most suited to either unique vehicle installations, or a kids/teenagers bedroom but likely better with a wall mounted VESA bracket. Only because you have to be maybe 1m for optimal viewing, maybe 2m max for casual viewing in the kitchen or something.And although it has a 160 degree wide angle view, again I'm struggling to imagine scenarious where even 2 or 3 people would be able to watch this at the same time, not on a Sofa due to the distance and it can't go opposite any bed either.So this "17 Smart TV is probably perfect for some less typical viewing scenarios, locations and applications, and it seems it's designed as such as it comes with a 12V car adapter/charger too. So there's definitely a market for 17" TVs, but I really don't know if this is good value or not, it doesnt scream "bargain" to me and I just think for around £114 or maybe less you could definitely find 1080P versions like this. And in many scenarios, there is a big difference between 1080P and 720P which will influence what the TVs performance is suitable for.Just like there is a clear distinction between 1080P and 4K UHD. There certainly is less appeal for 720P and I would have been giving this another star if it were 1080P.As a person who has owned and tested countless TV's, Monitors and Projectors, 1080p and FHD has been the standard for a very long time now in regular TVs and all Laptops/Monitors virtually are FHD so it might not sound like much but however this is used, to me at least 720P sort of relegates it to the "casual watching", for kids young teenagers maybe - Even with all the connectivity and Smart TV content and regular TV this can provide, there is no doubt that for this price, since you can most definitely buy 1080P versions of this for the same price or possibly less, nobody would choose 720P when 1080P FHD standard is available in this price range with the same features.I just have to be honest and say whatever you use this for, having spent time buying my own Dell 22" Monitor and a 65" TV recently, they're both different products but if I specifically wanted a 17" Smart TV with all the features this has then I personally would logically expect and prefer a 1080P version. I don't think it's unreasonable to say you can definitely get 1080P for this price. With all the WIFI 2.4Ghz, Ethernet, Digital optical connectivity and content that this Smart TV provides 99% of this context will be at least 1080P, Firesticks are 4K and regular TV such as sky is 1080 FHD as standard. So it's a shame this will be downscaling it all to 720P.I'm going to give it a generous 3 stars because this TV seems to be suited for atypical scenarios, I can't think of any scenarios or consumers that would want or choose 720P over FHD when 1080P is the standard. And at over £100 I just don't think many people would choose this when many, many 1080P 17" alternatives are available at this price or possibly lower.I personally would only use this as a 2nd or 3rd monitor for less important viewing or content, which means I'd not be utilising any of the connectivity, features and content this can provide. A kids bedroom or Monitor possibly, or maybe in a kitchen to watch cooking tutorials or something.Aside from that I can only think of travelling, motorhomes or even as a portable TV, since it seems to be designed for this. I think the market for such a TV is quite narrow, so it's rather unique to get full smart features in a TV of this size and design, it even supports terrestrial TV.So it's challenging to review being an atypical TV that is probably perfect for a less broadly appealing range of scenarios and somsumers, compared to a regular Smart TV. It has VESA also so in the market for such a unique TV I'm don't think there are many 17" TVs that are also full Smart TV's with all the connectivity of a much larger 4K TV, minus a couple of HDMIs and dual-band WIFI.Yet still, I think if I shopped for 17" Smart TVs, a very atypical market - I don't see any reason why this could not have been 1080P, the F energy rating isn't really relevant unless you're using some battery or generator to power this, which you might do on a Boat or something. So it's going to appeal to a narrow range of consumers, but I think KCR have designed it specifically for that market. I still think there is no reason why this could not have been 1080P, or that there are not FHD alternatives.As somebody who is used to larger 65" 4K UHD HDR10+ TVs and 1080P Monitors I might be wrong, but I'd personally look for FHD options if they're out there. But then for a large group of consumers that it's seemingly designed for, I think I can logically say that nobody would prefer 720P over FHD. But subjectively, the difference between 720P and 1080P may be less relevant or important to some, given it's small size and atypical design.Besides the resolution, for a 17" TV Mini TV it does have virtually all the connectivity and content/apps that you'd find in traditional much larger 4K Smart TVs, so it's uniquely good in that sense.

Non funziona non si aprono lapp goole goolepay