Kingston DataTraveler Kyson USB 3.2 Gen 1 Flash Drive 512GB - Met elegante, metalen behuizing zonder dop

Voldoet prima en nog altijd erg tevreden over dit merk je weet wat je krijg, klein en makkelijk mee te nemen

... value for money

Great for storage and backups. Was fast enough for my use case. Could have been build a little better tho, the black back part is a little loose.

I experienced slow transfer speeds from less than 512kb/sec to 50mbps on a gen 3.2 usb port and when I tried after this first transfer to do more I got notified 'this drive is write protected' and no further file transfers to or deletions from were possible and eventually the drive now does not show up at all when connected.The 512gb stick is in fact 461gb.I will order another to try for better luck 🤞**updateI did order another and sadly this proved just as slow. Slower than a 15 year old usb 2.0 a dog used as a chewtoy, held together with tape. That writes 33% faster than this second Kingston did also. Talked with Kingston techsupport after running some Crystaldiskmark tests and while those show as within spec, the actual real life performance was much poorer. Also reading files on a raspberry pi there were regular times where the pi was waiting for the usb drive to supply more data. Even just the act of deleting 60gb off the drive took an hour. Then this second drive died.

This USB heats up like crazy.After moving 40GB of music, it suddenly stopped transferring. Its died during the transfer process.I do not recommend this USB.

nothing is worst as data loss, this drive is not reliable and a big dissapointment as previous KINGSTON drive works already stable for 6 years.

Een scam

Zeer lage overdracht snelheid. Duurt ongeveer 20 minuten om een bestand van 15 GB over te zetten.

Rien a dire, parfait.

Üürn sorun elime ulaştı ve sorunsuz çalışıyor hızıda gayet iyi...Çok teşekkür ederim.

Very good product, real speed of 200 mbps

Excelente material funcionó sin ningún tema

UPDATED REVIEW: It turns out that file transfers through the command line have vastly different results so I'm willing to give the product the benefit of the doubt seeing how at least we know for sure the device is capable of better performance. It's reading and copying from rsync command in linux at 200MB (megaBYTES) per second using exFAT file system instead of NTFS, which is a much better result than I was getting through benchmarking 1,000x 10MB samples. It's definitely a solid a flash drive and good value at that speed. I'm keeping my review below for reference in case other purchasers run into the same mistake as I did.I'm attaching an updated screenshot using a gaming console backup of 110 gigs for this real world test scenario. This is absolutely fine performance, no complaints what so ever.Again, my review was not at all related to the seller, but rather the manufacturer.ORIGINAL REVIEW BELOW -----------------Performed 2 tests on this flash drive, freshly formatted to NTFS filesystem.Advertised reads 200MB/sActual reads: less than 43 MB/sAdvertised write speeds: 60 MB/sActual write speeds: This is not a problem with the seller, this is Kingston's advertised and stated figures. There's always going to be a difference between theoretical speeds and actual speeds, that's not the reason I'm critical. The difference between advertised speeds and actual speeds is horrendous though. It's not even half... it's not even half of half. Try to imagine transferring 128 gigs at 5 megabytes per second - that's 25,600 seconds or 426 minutes or in other words OVER 7 HOURS!!!Kingston advertises this drive transfers at USB 3.2 gen 1 speeds, but in reality even USB 2.0 from over a decade ago could exceed that speed. I'm annoyed by misleading advertising and for that reason alone I would not recommend this drive to anyone. It's a lot of capacity for a cheap price, and the metal casing helps a lot with dissipating heat during heavy usage, and the speeds are in line with other cheap flash drives you'll find anywhere. I'm just constantly disappointed by these marketing schemes trying to find a drive that actually using better internal components hoping one day I'll find one that does what it says. SD cards can do it so I know it's possible, but flash drive manufacturers don't seem to have any pride or dignity what so ever. Even the cache size for short burst of large files which all flash drives has is absolutely miniscule even compared to other similarly priced USB drives from several other brands.While writing this review I'm reformatting the drive to exFat, it's now 19.7% complete with an hour and 11 minutes remaining... get a portable ssd instead if you want larger capacity and USB 3.2 because this ain't that. It's suitable for a boot disk or something, but might as well get a 16GB or 32GB instead of 128GB so you don't ever have to wait all day to format it. I can't think of a single use case for this 128gig drive at these speeds, the large capacity is almost entirely useless.